Pacific Hydro
Developing and Implementing Process for Community Funds
We designed and delivered a deliberative process where a rural community was empowered to decide how to distribute funds available from a new wind farm being constructed in their locality.
Neighbours of the wind farm had vehemently opposed the project during the development phase. Empowering the neighbours to decide how the funds would be spent was potentially a high-risk engagement strategy which required extreme care in the delivery. It was important that this process had community ownership and was trusted by the neighbours.
A Community Partnerships Group (CPG) was formed and met eight times between March and September 2017. It was made clear at every meeting that the community had ownership of the process and of how the funds would be allocated. Over the course of the process, the CPG developed Terms of Reference for the group, decided upon a process for allocating the funds, allocated the funds and evaluated the process.
The group decided that it wanted to establish a community fund whereby local groups could apply for funding. During subsequent meetings, the group developed Terms of Reference for the fund, criteria for funding, decided how the fund would be promoted, the application and allocation process and the voting process. They also developed the process for continuing the group operation and membership over the following 24 years. At the sixth meeting, the first year’s funds were allocated by consensus despite many more applications than money available.
Two aspects of the process illustrate the members’ high degree of engagement in the process. Firstly, once the initial members understood the purpose of the project and the benefits it could bring to their local community, they enthusiastically recruited other members who could add value and broaden the representation. Group members were very active in promoting the fund, including organising a letterbox leaflet drop, putting up posters in community meeting places, approaching local groups to encourage them to apply, and discussing applications so that they didn’t conflict.
In the post-project evaluation, all members said that their objectives and expectations for participating in the group were achieved. They commented that the process had facilitated an effective, simple and smooth process that had empowered the members to make good decisions for their community.